•July 9, 2009 •
Leave a Comment
You bought the Phoenix album I recommended, right? Ye ole wcuk didn’t lead you astray on that rec, did he? This post around I’m bring the thunder with just one song. It’s Matt Pond’s Red Ankles. Catchy, seasonal, and brilliantly lyricized, if you don’t like this song, I must say, your taste is in your mouth.
I looked high and low to find a fulll version on the web. The amazon preview is the best I can offer without soliciting a letter from the RIAA. If you buy the song and don’t think it worth a dollar, I will refund your money, or not write a blog post for a week (whichever your prefer).
Sleeping became useless when the thought had hit my mind
the markings from your socks impressing skin into design
so with it walk away
The part I’ve faced
your face in parts
the lines that will not leave my head
a change like strings of lights that spark
looking down
your ankles red
I’ve imagined every single detail of the strain
the sickness is what I don’t know that will not go away
that will not go away
The instinct of cameras
is all for the instant
the nettles
the blueness
fallow for progress
the end of July
can’t be called liar
to you I am no liar
The part I’ve faced
your face in parts
the lines will not leave my head
a change like strings of light that spark
looking down
your ankles red
Posted in Music
Tags: matt pond pa
•July 7, 2009 •
1 Comment
Your celebrity encounter stories are really boring. Consider a sampling of some fantastically exciting quotes on the Reddit post, “Have you ever met a celebrity?” These are written by different people about different celebrities.
He was extremely gracious.
Really cool guy.
I also met Shaq, who was down to earth.
…is a damn nice guy
Cool guy, very tall
He was the nicest, most down to earth guy.
Very nice guy.
She was really nice
He seemed nice.
Bill Cosby. What a nice guy.
He is one of the nicest guys ever.
He’s a nice guy
overall pretty cool.
Really nice guy with a huge laugh.
Super nice guy,
He was a nice guy but he wasn’t a great tipper.
Oh, do go on! Tell me more! I’m on the precipice of caring too much. She was nice? He was totally down to earth, bro?! Get out. You don’t say.
Here’s a theory: most celebrities make millions of dollars to work 2 days a week and have loads of free time, during which people shower them with praise and attention. Don’t you think you’d be pretty “nice” and “down to earth” in those shoes? Something about the complete absolution from ever having to earn another dime in your lifetime just has that calming effect on people. The result? Your celebrity encounter reads like a bad 4th-grade book report. “He was nice. It was good. I like celebrities. She was pretty. Then he said something funny. I laughed. He was nice. I can’t believe she buys groceries just like me. When I grow up, I want to be nice and good like him. I like turtles. Sports are fun.”
This is the part of the post where commentors post specious counter examples in a statistically inane attempt to invalidate my post.
And this is the part where they decide not to post after all, because they would only be making my prophecy come true.
If this all sounds cynical, it’s because Miley wouldn’t autograph my DVD. (But it’s still all good, because her best friend Leslie made clear that she’s just being Miley.)
Posted in Musing
Tags: celebrities
•June 24, 2009 •
1 Comment
You’ve heard of the Erdos number.
You’ve heard of the Bacon number.
Now, you’ve even heard of the Imaginary Erdos number.
I am proposing the Erdos-Bacon Quaternion, a quaternion representation of one’s real & complex separation from co-authorship with Erdos and co-actingship with kevin Bacon:

For example, if you’ve written a paper with Erdos, written a paper with a dream coauthor of Erdos, and have acted in a film with an actor 2 steps removed from Bacon, you have number 1 + 2i + 3k.
Patents pending.
Posted in Musing
Tags: Erdos, kevin bacon, math
•June 22, 2009 •
27 Comments

Almost every discipline of statistical science requires a confidence level be ascribed to a result. You have to estimate with what certainty you think your results/hypothesis will hold. Call it statistical significance, error bars, hypothesis testing, or whatever you’d like. Good scientists say how right they think they are.
Yet, meteorologists don’t normally give a confidence measure with the weather report. Why?
Here in NJ we’ve had rain on and off for weeks. Every day the weather forecast is something resembling “40%* chance of thunderstorms. Showers Possible. Party Cloudy. 72 degrees.” Roughly speaking, this translates to, “We have no idea what the weather will be, though we are slightly more than 0% sure it wont be sunny and 90.” Fair enough, weather forecasting is a chaotic science. We can’t (wont) ever predict chaotic events far in the future. But what’s the harm in admitting uncertainty? Surely there are times when meteorologists are pretty damn sure of the weather (e.g. during a drought with no fronts in sight, or in Buffalo during any day of the winter) and times when their guess is as good as my LL Bean barometer (e.g. the humid, wily days of summer, where an evening thunderstorm is as much a coin toss as the baseball game it ruins). Why not say, “we are a paltry 10% sure there is a 50% chance of precipitation in the region”? I refuse to believe confidence has gone unnoticed by academic meteorologists, so why hasn’t it trickled in to mainstream forecasting?
Enlighten me, weather(wo)men.
*As I understand it, the percent chance of precipitation given by most forecasts refers to the chance that a measurable amount of rain (usually to 1/100th of an inch) will fall somewhere in the region. While a 100% chance means it’s probably going ot rain, it doesn’t tell you the confidence with which that 100% prediction is made.
Posted in Science
Tags: weather
•June 19, 2009 •
1 Comment
Posted in Photos
Tags: animals, eat
•April 23, 2009 •
6 Comments
Posted in Worthless
Tags: unicorns
•April 8, 2009 •
Leave a Comment

Who would attend this? This really shouldn’t be this hard.
Whether we wish them to or not, students often rely on Wikipedia as a source of information. This session will discuss ways of teaching students to use critical judgment when reading Wikipedia articles.
Date: Tuesday, April 14
Time: 2:00pm – 3:00pm
Place: Busch Campus Center, room 120AB, BC
This workshop qualifies for the 21st Century Professor Certificate Program.
Is this college now? Instructors working towards “21st Century Professor” Certificates? Students who don’t know a credible source from a Pop Tart? Professors who need to attend an hour long seminar to tell their conniving ratlings that the Internet is not a scholarly source?
I wish I went through college in the 1950s. Back then, you got a D if you wrote some crappy paper with crappy sources. Now, we have seminars to teach professors how to hold hands and sing Kumbaya with any student who gets an A-.
Here’s your seminar: don’t cite stupid stuff. Now get off my lawn.
Posted in Get off my lawn